Perfil de personalidad en pacientes con trasplante renal: el modelo alternativo de los cinco factores / Personality profile of kidney transplant patients: the alternative five factor model

Resumen Introducción: la investigación sobre rasgos de personalidad en pacientes con trasplante renal es limitada. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir el perfil de personalidad de pacientes con trasplante renal, utilizando el modelo alternativo de cinco factores (AFFM), y compararlo con población estándar española. Material y métodos: la personalidad fue evaluada mediante el Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ). Una muestra de 207 pacientes con trasplante renal se emparejó por edad y género con 207controles de la población estándar. El análisis de regresión logística permitió estudiar la aportación de cada dimensión del ZKPQ al perfil distintivo de los pacientes trasplantados. Resultados: aparecieron diferencias significativas en las dimensiones de Neuroticismo-Ansiedad (p=.001), Agresión-Hostilidad (p=.009) y Actividad (p=.001), con puntuaciones bajas en pacientes trasplantados en comparación con la población estándar. La sociabilidad (p=.024) fue significativamente mayor en pacientes trasplantados. En el análisis de regresión, las bajas puntuaciones en Neuroticismo-Ansiedad (p=.005) y Actividad (p=.001) fueron predictores significativos para caracterizar los rasgos de personalidad de pacientes trasplantados. Conclusiones: desde el AFFM, los pacientes con trasplante renal muestran un perfil diferente de personalidad comparado con la población estándar, con bajas puntuaciones en las dimensiones de Neuroticismo-Ansiedad y Actividad.

Abstract Background: There is limited research on personality traits that characterized kidney transplant patients. The aim of this study was to describe personality profile of kidney transplant patients using the Alternative Five Factor Model (AFFM), and compared it with the Spanish standard population. Method: Personality was assessed using the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ). A sample of 207 kidney transplant patients was matched by age and gender with 207 standard range controls. A logistic regression analyses was utilized to study the contribution of each ZKPQ dimension to describe the distinctive transplant patient's profile. Results: Significant differences were showed in Neuroticism-Anxiety (p=.001), Aggression-Hostility (p=.009), and Activity (p=.001) dimensions, with lower scores on transplant patients compared with standard population. But Sociability (p=.024) was significantly higher on kidney transplant patients. In logistic regression analysis low scores on Neuroticism-Anxiety (p=.005) and Activity (p=.001) were the significant predictors to characterize personality traits of kidney transplant patients. Conclusions: Kidney transplant patients had a differential profile under the AFFM compared to standard range sample, with lower scores on Neuroticism-Anxiety and Activity dimensions.

A misprocessed form of Apolipoprotein A-I is specifically associated with recurrent Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis.

Apolipoprotein A-Ib (ApoA-Ib) is a high molecular weight form of Apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I) found specifically in the urine of kidney-transplanted patients with recurrent idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). To determine the nature of the modification present in ApoA-Ib, we sequenced the whole APOA1 gene in ApoA-Ib positive and negative patients, and we also studied the protein primary structure using mass spectrometry. No genetic variations in the APOA1 gene were found in the ApoA-Ib positive patients that could explain the increase in its molecular mass. The mass spectrometry analysis revealed three extra amino acids at the N-Terminal end of ApoA-Ib that were not present in the standard plasmatic form of ApoA-I. These amino acids corresponded to half of the propeptide sequence of the immature form of ApoA-I (proApoA-I) indicating that ApoA-Ib is a misprocessed form of proApoA-I. The description of ApoA-Ib could be relevant not only because it can allow the automated analysis of this biomarker in the clinical practice but also because it has the potential to shed light into the molecular mechanisms that cause idiopathic FSGS, which is currently unknown.

Evaluación de la empatía en donante vivo de riñón / Evaluation of emphathy in living kidney donors

No disponible

Health-related behaviours after 1 year of renal transplantation.

Health-related behaviours and psychological distress were examined after kidney transplantation. Patients were evaluated at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after transplantation. Participants completed the Healthy Behaviours Questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. No significant differences in Healthy Behaviours Questionnaire's total score and psychological comorbidity were observed at three time points. However, there was an increase in drug-consumer habits ( p < 0.05) and a reduction in sedentary lifestyle ( p < 0.05) at 6 months and 1 year. Moreover, at 1 year, post-transplant had increased the harmful health habits ( p < 0.05). In regression analysis, anxiety symptoms were significant predictors of Healthy Behaviours Questionnaire change at a year post-transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus prevention strategies in seropositive kidney transplant recipients: an insight into current clinical practice.

There is notable heterogeneity in the implementation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention practices among CMV-seropositive (R+) kidney transplant (KT) recipients. In this prospective observational study, we included 387 CMV R+ KT recipients from 25 Spanish centers. Prevention strategies (antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy) were applied according to institutional protocols at each site. The impact on the 12-month incidence of CMV disease was assessed by Cox regression. Asymptomatic CMV infection, acute rejection, graft function, non-CMV infection, graft loss, and all-cause mortality were also analyzed (secondary outcomes). Models were adjusted for a propensity score (PS) analysis for receiving antiviral prophylaxis. Overall, 190 patients (49.1%) received preemptive therapy, 185 (47.8%) antiviral prophylaxis, and 12 (3.1%) no specific intervention. Twelve-month cumulative incidences of CMV disease and asymptomatic infection were 3.6% and 39.3%, respectively. Patients on prophylaxis had lower incidence of CMV disease [PS-adjusted HR (aHR): 0.10; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01-0.79] and asymptomatic infection (aHR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.29-0.72) than those managed preemptively, with no significant differences according to the duration of prophylaxis. All cases of CMV disease in the prophylaxis group occurred after prophylaxis discontinuation. There were no differences in any of the secondary outcomes. In conclusion, antiviral prophylaxis was associated with a lower occurrence of CMV disease in CMV R+ KT recipients, although such benefit should be balanced with the risk of late-onset disease.

Hypertension in chronic kidney disease: the influence of renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is one of the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factors in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and kidney transplants. The contribution of transplantation to hypertension in comparison to patients with CKD and similar renal function has not been characterized. METHODS: Ninety-two transplants and 97 CKD patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m not receiving dialysis were enrolled. At entry, office blood pressure (BP) and 24-hr ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) were obtained. RESULTS: Office BP was not different between transplants and CKD patients (139.5±14.3 vs. 135.2±19.3, P=1.00, respectively). ABPM 24-hr systolic blood pressure (SBP) (133.9±14.3 vs. 126.2±16.1, P=0.014), awake SBP (135.6±15.2 vs. 128.7±16.2, P=0.042), and sleep SBP (131.2±16.2 vs. 120.2 ±17.9, P=0.0014) were higher in renal transplants. When patients were classified according to BP patterns associated with highest cardiovascular risk, the proportion of patients with both nocturnal hypertension and non-dipper pattern was higher in transplants (68.5% vs. 47.4%, P=0.03). In the multivariate regression analysis, transplantation was an independent predictor of 24-hr, awake, and sleep SBP. CONCLUSION: Office BP is similar in kidney transplants and CKD patients with similar renal function. On the contrary, hypertension is more severe in kidney transplants when evaluated with ABPM mainly as a result of increased sleep systolic BP. Thus, precise evaluation of hypertension in kidney transplants requires ABPM.